WTA cheat sheet

The WTA cheat sheet lists 19 research rows across 4 sheets for the next scheduled matches, as of October 30, 2026 at 10:46 PM ET. Each sheet states its qualifying rule; every figure comes from stored results, with its sample. Top row: Bianca Andreescu, Won 9 of last 10 matches.

Research as of October 30, 2026 at 10:46 PM ET · Updated October 30, 2026 at 10:46 PM ET · StatsNext stored results

On this page

Recent form

Players in scheduled matches who won 70% or more of their last 10 played matches (at least 3; walkovers excluded).

Recent form (WTA)
PlayerMatchupWhat the record showsSample
Bianca Andreescuvs Alicia Herrero Linana · Quarterfinals · QUERETARO 125Last 10: Won 9 of last 10 matches
Clay: 6-5 on clay (12 months)
Alicia Herrero Linana: Opponent won 8 of last 10
9 of 10 (90%)
Kaitlin Quevedovs Lilli Tagger · Semifinals · GUANGZHOULast 10: Won 9 of last 10 matches
Hard: 18-8 on hard (12 months)
Lilli Tagger: Opponent won 6 of last 10
9 of 10 (90%)
Harriet Dartvs Xinran Sun · Semifinals · GUANGZHOULast 10: Won 9 of last 10 matches
Hard: 20-8 on hard (12 months)
Xinran Sun: Opponent won 6 of last 8
9 of 10 (90%)
Julia Grabhervs Julia Riera · Semifinals · CURITIBA 125Last 10: Won 8 of last 10 matches
Clay: 19-9 on clay (12 months)
Julia Riera: Opponent won 6 of last 10
8 of 10 (80%)
Mia Pohankovavs Diana Shnaider · Semifinals · TOKYOLast 10: Won 8 of last 10 matches
Hard: 12-4 on hard (12 months)
Diana Shnaider: Opponent won 8 of last 10
8 of 10 (80%)

The top 5 of 16 qualifying rows.

Recent form: the full sheet in StatsNext: every qualifying row, with current sportsbook lines and hit rates against them where the sheet uses them (the top 5 rows free, every row with StatsNext Pro)

Surface form

Players who won 70% or more of their matches on this tournament’s surface over the last 12 months (at least 3).

Surface form (WTA)
PlayerMatchupWhat the record showsSample
Harriet Dartvs Xinran Sun · Semifinals · GUANGZHOUHard: Won 20 of 28 on hard (12 months)
Xinran Sun: Opponent 5-1 on hard
20 of 28 (71%)
Mia Pohankovavs Diana Shnaider · Semifinals · TOKYOHard: Won 12 of 16 on hard (12 months)
Diana Shnaider: Opponent 26-14 on hard
12 of 16 (75%)
Xinran Sunvs Harriet Dart · Semifinals · GUANGZHOUHard: Won 5 of 6 on hard (12 months)
Harriet Dart: Opponent 20-8 on hard
5 of 6 (83%)
Nauhany Vitoria Leme Da Silvavs Alice Tubello · Semifinals · CURITIBA 125Clay: Won 3 of 4 on clay (12 months)
Alice Tubello: Opponent 11-9 on clay
3 of 4 (75%) (small sample)

All 4 qualifying rows.

Surface form: the full sheet in StatsNext: every qualifying row, with current sportsbook lines and hit rates against them where the sheet uses them (the top 5 rows free, every row with StatsNext Pro)

Head-to-head

Scheduled matches whose players have met at least twice (every stored meeting; walkovers excluded): who leads the meetings.

No row qualifies for this sheet right now.

Head-to-head: the full sheet in StatsNext: every qualifying row, with current sportsbook lines and hit rates against them where the sheet uses them (the top 5 rows free, every row with StatsNext Pro)

Serve strength

Players whose service points won, averaged over their last 10 matches with stats, is 3 or more points above their opponent’s (at least 3 matches each).

Serve strength (WTA)
PlayerMatchupWhat the record shows
Emerson Jonesvs Heather Watson · Qualifying · HONG KONGService points won: 62.3% avg over 10 matches · opponent 55% (10)
First serve won: 66.3% · 2.3 aces per match
Bianca Andreescuvs Alicia Herrero Linana · Quarterfinals · QUERETARO 125Service points won: 64.6% avg over 10 matches · opponent 58.3% (10)
First serve won: 69.9% · 3.2 aces per match
Alice Tubellovs Nauhany Vitoria Leme Da Silva · Semifinals · CURITIBA 125Service points won: 59% avg over 10 matches · opponent 50% (6)
First serve won: 62.2% · 0.7 aces per match
Julia Grabhervs Julia Riera · Semifinals · CURITIBA 125Service points won: 58.6% avg over 10 matches · opponent 53.3% (10)
First serve won: 63.7% · 0.9 aces per match
Leylah Fernandezvs Kamilla Rakhimova · Semifinals · TOKYOService points won: 58.7% avg over 10 matches · opponent 54% (10)
First serve won: 64.7% · 2.5 aces per match

The top 5 of 8 qualifying rows.

Serve strength: the full sheet in StatsNext: every qualifying row, with current sportsbook lines and hit rates against them where the sheet uses them (the top 5 rows free, every row with StatsNext Pro)

Return strength

Players whose return points won, averaged over their last 10 matches with stats, is 3 or more points above their opponent’s (at least 3 matches each).

Return strength (WTA)
PlayerMatchupWhat the record shows
Emerson Jonesvs Heather Watson · Qualifying · HONG KONGReturn points won: 47.3% avg over 10 matches · opponent 39.3% (10)
Break points converted: 48.1% (match average)
Aliona Faleivs Ekaterina Yashina · Qualifying · CHENNAIReturn points won: 47.3% avg over 10 matches · opponent 39.5% (9)
Break points converted: 38.1% (match average)
Anna Blinkovavs Noma Noha Akugue · Semifinals · COURMAYEUR 125Return points won: 47.8% avg over 10 matches · opponent 42.3% (10)
Break points converted: 59% (match average)
Harriet Dartvs Xinran Sun · Semifinals · GUANGZHOUReturn points won: 51.7% avg over 10 matches · opponent 45.6% (8)
Break points converted: 59.3% (match average)
Kaitlin Quevedovs Lilli Tagger · Semifinals · GUANGZHOUReturn points won: 45.7% avg over 10 matches · opponent 42% (10)
Break points converted: 49.9% (match average)

The top 5 of 8 qualifying rows.

Return strength: the full sheet in StatsNext: every qualifying row, with current sportsbook lines and hit rates against them where the sheet uses them (the top 5 rows free, every row with StatsNext Pro)

How these cheat sheets work

  • Every figure is from stored matches: statistics, never sportsbook lines, odds or prices. Player thresholds are statistical: each player’s featured threshold, the one nearest the player’s usual output, as on the player’s prop research page.
  • Player rows are ordered by the lower bound of a 95% confidence interval on the hit rate, so a long record ranks above a short one at the same percentage; a small sample is marked.
  • The sheets describe what already happened. They are not predictions, picks or value estimates, and a high past rate does not make a bet likely to win.
  • The page is rebuilt with each daily research refresh; rows for matches that have started drop off at the next refresh.

This page shows statistics and results only. It contains no sportsbook prices or betting lines. Current markets, hit rates against the line and StatsNext research are in the app.

Keep researching